One of the options for improving the therapeutic profile of treatment for locally and locoregionally advanced malignant tumors of the head and neck is using another type of radiotherapy with a more suitable dose distribution profile. This option is proton radiotherapy. Proton radiotherapy makes it possible to reduce the risks of RT for healthy tissue and to increase the likelihood of curing the tumor due to the possible increase of the overall dose to the tumor region.

Proton radiotherapy is the technological advantage in local and locoregional cancer treatment. In conventional photon radiation beam is most of the energy of the beam delivered to the tissues below the body surface and the dose in the tissue decreases with increasing depth. In contrast, protons have quite a different characteristic shape of the depth dose distribution respectively. Depth dose curves depending on so called Bragg curve.

The main advantage of proton therapy derived from the Bragg peak allows to deliver a predefined dose with high accuracy anywhere in the body directly into the tumor. Healthy tissue lying in front of tumors (approximately 30% of the absorbed energy protons) is preserved and complete protection of healthy tissue behind the tumor, because it does not absorb any energy. It also allows you to increase the dose to the tumor target volume, increasing thereby the likelihood of local disease control. At a given dose, unwanted side effects on healthy tissue are reduced.

Proton beams also have a higher biological efficacy than conventional radiation because of their dense ionization. This leads to suppression of the effect of oxygen and increased DNA damage of affected cells. If the damage happens, multiple cells stop dividing and die. Radiobiology efficiency of protons is approximately 1.1 x higher than photons (i.e. conventional RT).

Advantages of a use of Proton Therapy:

  • Larger investigation surrounding healthy tissue with a reduced risk of toxicity and costs associated with treatment of postirradiation toxicity (artificial nutrition, including the introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, hormone replacement hypofunction during postirradiation pituitary and thyroid gland, treatment of skin defects after RT treatment of xerostomia, which is caused by impaired salivary glands after photon radiotherapy).
  • Reduction of late side effects significantly affecting the quality of life of patients, such as permanent swallowing difficulties and PEG dependence, hearing disorders, radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction and in some cases xerostomia, which is caused by damage to the salivary glands after radiotherapy.
  • Improved local disease control with reduced costs for rescue treatment (chemotherapy, biological targeted biological therapy).

 

Figure 1 and Table 1 show an example of an irradiation photon IMRT and proton IMPT plan and dose distribution to individual organs. It is clear that a significantly lower or zero dose is applied to healthy tissue with proton radiotherapy. 

Table 1: Doses to individual structures/organs

  IMRT (photons) IMPT (protons)
Target volume (ethmoidal cavity) 70 Gy (100%) 70 Gy (100%)
Eyes (lens) Dmax 10,11 Gy (14,3%) 1,77 Gy (2,5%)
Brain stem Dmax 28,6 Gy (40,8%) 0,47 Gy (0,6%)
Chiasma opticumDmax 46,9 Gy (67%) 44,1 Gy (63%)
Chiasma opticum Dmean 31,5 Gy (45%) 5,0 Gy (7%)

Comparison of Proton and Conventional Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of ENT and Orofacial Tumors

When comparing conventional and proton RT, there is a clear benefit in reducing the burden on the healthy tissues and increasing the dose delivered to the tumor. This dose reduction is not limited to a single organ. On the contrary, it is a complete reduction of radiation exposure to healthy tissues. The level of this reduction is individual. For example, the dose used to irradiate the brain tissue in patients with tumors of the nasopharynx or paranasal sinuses is usually reduced to 10-20% of the usual dose for intensity-modulate photon radiotherapy (IMRT). The dose reduction to the swallowing path and larynx is usually about 50% for the above diagnoses during irradiation of the bilateral cervical lymph nodes.

In properly selected indications, proton radiotherapy allows the administration of high doses of radiation in combination with chemotherapy, with minimal risk of hospitalization, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and treatment with opioid analgesics.

Book "Protonová radioterapie", author Pavel Vítek et al., published by Maxdorf

Purchase the book via the link below.

Book "Co byste měli vědět o rakovině prsu", author Jitka Abrahámová et al., published by Grada

Purchase the book via the link below.